Tech • AI • Robotics • Game
We Review 'You Can See Everything', Tesla Unveils Rocket-Powered Roadster | Diet TBPN
TL;DR
A new film about Elizabeth Holmes appears to be reshaping some viewers’ perceptions of the Theranos saga, while a separate discussion around Tesla’s Roadster highlighted growing skepticism over ambitious product demos and long-delayed deliveries.
KEY POINTS
Film draws strong reactions
A newly released dramatization centered on Elizabeth Holmes, Billy Evans, and the collapse of Theranos generated unusually intense audience responses, with viewers describing it as funny, unsettling and visually striking. The production’s cinematography drew particular praise for its polished look in confined, naturalistic settings, reinforcing the sense that the film is being received as a high-end prestige release rather than a routine biopic.
Perceptions of Holmes may be softening
An informal poll organized by Liz Wessel of First Round after an early screening suggested the film may improve attitudes toward Holmes. Of 16 attendees surveyed from a larger group of 150 founders, investors and builders, 14 said they felt more positive about Holmes afterward, 1 felt more negative and 1 reported no change. The same sample said all 16 felt more negative about Billy Evans.
Sympathy centers on family and imprisonment
The shift appears tied less to a reassessment of fraud allegations than to the portrayal of personal costs surrounding Holmes’ prison sentence and family life. Scenes involving her children and the period before incarceration reportedly left many viewers with greater sympathy for Holmes as a person, even among those who still believe she was guilty.
Tesla Roadster reveal sparks excitement and frustration
Discussion then turned to Tesla’s Roadster, which impressed on spectacle but disappointed on timing. The biggest sticking point was the statement that the car will enter production in 2028, extending a wait that began after reservations opened in 2017. For early backers, the delay renewed doubts about whether the long-promised halo car is a serious near-term product or another rolling concept.
Deposits remain steep for an uncertain launch
Pricing details underscored the gap between hype and availability. A base reservation requires $5,000 down immediately and $45,000 within 10 days, while the version with thrusters requires $250,000 total within the same window. Pricing for any more advanced flight-capable configuration remains unclear, leaving prospective buyers with limited certainty beyond a costly place in line.
Thruster technology blurs line between car and stunt machine
The Roadster demo featured cold-gas thrusters, ramp-assisted aerial tricks and suggestions of extreme performance, including hints that the vehicle could challenge race-car territory on a track. Supporters see real engineering potential in added downforce and acceleration, while critics argue that the airborne elements look more like a party trick than a usable feature for normal owners.
Legal and safety questions remain unresolved
Even enthusiasts acknowledged that a road-going vehicle with high-pressure thruster systems would face regulatory hurdles and likely geofencing or software restrictions. Concerns included whether such features would be street-legal, whether tracks would allow them during public sessions, and how quickly users might try to bypass safeguards.
A contrast in automotive philosophy
The Roadster was contrasted with the Mission X, a concept praised as a more traditional supercar vision rooted in familiar design language rather than radical propulsion. That comparison framed the Roadster as a bet on theatrical future-facing innovation, while rivals appeal to nostalgia, driver focus and proven formulas.
Market turmoil adds to the backdrop
The conversation unfolded against a sharp selloff in U.S. equities. The Nasdaq was cited as down roughly 2.4% on the day and 4.7% for the week, nearing its worst weekly decline in more than a year, with AI-related shares under particular pressure. That broader weakness sharpened the contrast between market anxiety and the optimism often attached to headline-grabbing tech spectacles.
CONCLUSION
The two debates converged on a similar theme: compelling storytelling can reshape perception, but audiences and consumers still want proof. Whether in the aftermath of Theranos or in the promises surrounding Tesla, spectacle alone is no substitute for delivery.
Ask a question