Tech • AI • Robotics • Game
Life in Europe is too comfortable”: Cristina Caffarra’s wake-up call
6/10TL;DR
Cristina Caffarra argues that Europe will not rebuild technological power through regulation alone and must instead mobilize private capital, scale companies aggressively and act like a superpower in its own market.
KEY POINTS
From antitrust to industrial push
Caffarra, founder of the EuroStack Initiative Foundation and a former antitrust and regulation economist, says Europe has spent roughly 25 years focused on the wrong objective. In her view, regulating Big Tech did not create a European cloud, software sector or digital champions. The urgent task now is not more rulemaking but building.
The case for EuroStack
EuroStack is presented as a mission to help European technology reach scale by turning existing strengths into industrial capacity. Europe, she says, already has talent, know-how and capital across cities from Stockholm and Copenhagen to Paris, Berlin, Munich, Amsterdam and Zurich. The problem is not absence of resources but failure to channel them fast enough into growth.
A direct attack on the “Brussels effect”
Caffarra sharply rejects the idea that exporting regulation is a meaningful European success model. She argues that celebrating the “Brussels effect” encouraged policymakers to mistake influence over rules for leadership in products and platforms. For her, a continent should export things people want to buy, not just compliance frameworks.
Why regulation is not enough
Her central criticism is that regulation has been treated as a substitute for industrial strategy. Measures aimed at Google Search or the Apple App Store, she argues, may constrain incumbents but do not automatically produce European alternatives. She describes that assumption as a form of magical thinking that left Europe admiring the problem instead of solving it.
Private sector first
Caffarra says durable change must come primarily from founders, builders and investors rather than governments or the European Commission. Profitability, addressable markets, funding, performance targets and a clear differentiator remain the basic ingredients of viable companies. Appeals to European values alone, she argues, do not create sustainable businesses.
Skepticism toward institutional promises
She is dismissive of what she sees as slow and vague policymaking, including sovereignty plans built around support, encouragement and future legislation. In her reading, major initiatives can take years to pass while competitive pressure is immediate. Headlines about financial integration often mask limited agreement and little operational change.
The capital exists, but deployment lags
A key part of her argument is that Europe already has deep pools of money but fails to make them fluid across borders. She is pessimistic that a full capital markets union or fully integrated single market will arrive soon enough to solve the problem. Rather than waiting for perfect institutions, she says investors should back the strongest firms now.
No excuse culture
Caffarra also challenges the claim that regulation alone prevents companies from expanding in Europe. She points to examples such as Amazon’s mid-2000s expansion across Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the UK as evidence that determined businesses can still scale quickly. Simplifying incorporation through ideas such as a 28th regime or EU Inc would help, she says, but should not become another excuse for inaction.
Europe as superpower, not middle power
She rejects the growing description of Europe as a middle power, calling it both alarming and false. Her view is that Europe remains a superpower by wealth, talent, history and market size, but behaves as if it were smaller than it is. The challenge is psychological as much as institutional: acting with urgency, ambition and self-belief.
Comfort, pride and a shifting mood
Caffarra says one reason for drift is that life in Europe is relatively comfortable, reducing hunger and risk-taking. At the same time, she sees a positive shift over the past year: sovereignty is now better understood as winning a larger share of the European market, not excluding the United States. She also detects stronger public pride in being European, a change she believes could support a more assertive industrial agenda.
CONCLUSION
Caffarra’s message is that Europe still has the assets to shape its technological future, but only if it stops waiting for regulation to deliver industry. Her prescription is blunt: deploy capital, scale companies and act with the confidence of a power that still has much of its strength intact.
Ask a question