
Tech • AI • Robotics • Game
Tesla says its next-generation Cybercab drive unit eliminates rare earths, cuts cost and weight, and is built on a highly automated line that outputs one unit every 10 seconds, targeting a major break from China-dominated magnet supply chains.
Tesla adopted neodymium permanent-magnet motors in the Model 3 in 2017 because they deliver strong performance in a smaller, lighter package and are highly efficient at steady speeds. That efficiency reduces heat losses and helps extend driving range from a given battery pack.
Neodymium magnets for high-performance EVs often need small amounts of heavy rare earths such as dysprosium and terbium to maintain performance at high temperatures. China controls about 90% of global rare-earth processing and roughly 90% of rare-earth magnet production, leaving automakers exposed even when the missing material amounts to only a few dozen grams per vehicle.
In April 2025, China added export controls on seven medium and heavy rare earth elements, including dysprosium and terbium, as well as some magnets containing them. The impact quickly reached industry production lines, with Ford temporarily halting Explorer output in Chicago, while Tesla also reported delays tied to magnets needed for Optimus robot joints.
The EV industry has spent years trying to replace rare-earth magnets without sacrificing compactness, efficiency or weight. Induction motors, used in the original Roadster and Model S, avoid permanent magnets but consume extra energy to energize the rotor, while ferrite magnets are cheaper and abundant yet far weaker than neodymium.
In March 2023, Tesla said its next-generation permanent-magnet motor would use zero rare earth elements. After months of limited detail, the company later presented the Cybercab motor as reportedly 18% smaller, 25% lighter and more efficient than its previous high-performance drive unit, while also costing about 30% less.
Tesla has not publicly identified the exact magnet material or layout. Engineering analysis has pointed to ferrite magnets combined with a Halbach array, a configuration that concentrates magnetic flux where it is useful and weakens it where it is not, potentially offsetting the much lower magnetic energy of ferrite compared with neodymium.
The Cybercab uses a single front-mounted permanent-magnet synchronous motor with a single-speed gearbox and peak output of 163 kW. Reported energy consumption is about 165 Wh per mile, supported by a vehicle mass of roughly 1,412 kg and an estimated battery pack near 48 kWh.
The motor uses hairpin copper windings instead of conventional round-wire windings. That design can raise slot fill to around 70%, allowing more copper in the stator, lowering resistance and improving heat transfer, while motor speed reportedly exceeds 15,000 rpm to extract more performance from a compact package.
The headline manufacturing figure is a line cycle time of under 10 seconds, meaning one completed drive unit can leave the line roughly every 10 seconds once production is flowing. That does not mean a single unit is built from start to finish in 10 seconds, but it does indicate a highly automated process aligned with Tesla’s broader high-volume manufacturing strategy.
If the design removes dysprosium and other rare earths entirely, it could eliminate a major cost item, since permanent magnets can account for roughly 25% to 30% of an EV motor’s material cost. The impact could extend beyond Cybercab to products such as Optimus, where each humanoid robot may require dozens of actuators, multiplying demand for magnets far beyond that of a single car.
Tesla’s rare-earth-free motor push is as much a supply-chain strategy as an engineering one. If the company can scale the design to millions of units with the promised cost, weight and efficiency gains, it could reshape how EV motors and robotic actuators are built.
Ask a question