
Tech • AI • Robotics • Game
Nvidia remained at the center of the technology sector after Jensen Wong resigned, with employees, investors and industry figures debating whether the company can sustain its strategy, culture and market position without its founder-led dealmaking and engineering leadership.
Nvidia is still dealing with the fallout from the abrupt resignation of chief executive Jensen Wong, who also left the board. The departure has been treated across markets as a defining technology story because of Nvidia’s role in AI infrastructure, semiconductor supply and private-market financing. The immediate concern is not only succession, but whether the company loses the aggressive decision-making style that helped it dominate the AI boom.
Internal unrest has surfaced as some employees call for Wong to come back. Reporting cited internal messages and a suggestion-box post that drew more than 1,600 comments at a company with roughly 42,000 employees, with multiple comments urging the board to restore him. The campaign has extended beyond internal channels, suggesting that support for Wong is not confined to venture investors or outside shareholders.
Interim chief executive Klet Crest is under pressure after reports that Wong privately questioned her strategic instincts before his ouster. He reportedly described her as too cautious and more suited to financial reporting than company strategy. That criticism has sharpened a broader debate over whether Nvidia now needs a disciplined operator or another high-velocity leader willing to use leverage, pursue unconventional partnerships and move faster than rivals.
The succession debate has exposed two competing models for Nvidia’s future. One camp argues the company needs another founder-style executive able to break internal stalemates, push through technical bets and strike fast deals across the AI ecosystem. The other says Nvidia may still thrive under a more restrained, committee-driven structure if its existing product roadmap, culture and cash generation remain strong.
Investors are not only weighing Wong’s product vision but also what many see as his role as a power broker for the broader AI industry. Supporters argue his advantage was combining engineering judgment with the ability to assess startups, structure partnerships and allocate scarce compute strategically. That combination is viewed as a key part of Nvidia’s moat, and one reason markets fear a lower valuation multiple without him.
A widely shared anecdote about Wong described him praising a Japanese soup seller who refused to overserve one customer at the expense of others. He used the story to argue that scarce, high-value products should be allocated across a broad customer base rather than concentrated in a few buyers. The anecdote resonated because it mirrors Nvidia’s own strategy in AI chips: keep pricing power high while maintaining a diverse set of customers.
Separately, TSMC confirmed a cyber incident involving an outside cloud provider that stored records on current and former employees. A seller claimed to hold about 46,000 records totaling 6.9 gigabytes and offered the data for 3 bitcoin, roughly $220,000. The exposed fields reportedly include national ID numbers, addresses, bank details and emergency contacts, raising risks of identity theft, fraud and corporate espionage.
Microsoft 365 and Outlook suffered a major outage that appeared to last more than 24 hours, far longer than a significant 2023 disruption that lasted about 5 hours in the worst cases. Microsoft’s status page described the problem as service degradation rather than a confirmed cyberattack. The scale and duration raised questions about whether rising automated traffic and AI-driven usage are putting new strains on large cloud communication systems.
Analysts and industry researchers said several leading Chinese AI labs, including DeepSeek, Moonshot, MiniMax and Ant Group, appear to have trained recent models on Nvidia Blackwell chips despite U.S. export restrictions. The claim is based in part on software code and training traces that suggest Blackwell hardware was used. If correct, it would intensify scrutiny over smuggling routes, compliance failures and the extent to which relatively small numbers of advanced chips can still keep Chinese labs near the frontier.
The immediate issue for Nvidia is leadership, but the larger question is whether the AI era’s most important infrastructure company can preserve its speed, influence and pricing power without the executive who embodied all three. At the same time, fresh cyber and export-control concerns show how fragile the wider AI supply chain remains.
Ask a question