
Tech • AI • Robotics • Game
ARK Invest chief Cathie Wood said a future merger between Tesla and SpaceX remains plausible, with shareholder support at Tesla seen as the decisive hurdle rather than headline valuation.
Cathie Wood said Tesla and SpaceX are likely to be combined eventually, reinforcing a long-running view that Elon Musk could fold his major industrial and AI assets into a single group. The strategic logic centers on bringing together EVs, robotaxis, humanoid robots, energy systems, satellites, launch services, broadband, and AI infrastructure under one corporate structure.
The central challenge is not approval from SpaceX investors, where Musk is seen as having enough voting power to secure support, but a vote at Tesla. Any proposal would likely require broad confidence that existing Tesla shareholders understand SpaceX well enough to judge the upside and not reject the deal on dilution fears or unfamiliarity with the private company’s economics.
The bullish case holds that resistance to a merger mostly comes from investors who have modeled Tesla in detail but have not done the same for SpaceX. The argument is that once investors examine Starlink, launch services, direct-to-cell communications, AI models and especially AI compute, support for a merger should increase, even if SpaceX were valued as the larger partner in the transaction.
The most aggressive forecasts focus on SpaceX building a large AI compute business, leasing capacity for training and inference. Based on recent estimates tied to roughly 660,000 GB300 chips, a little over 1 gigawatt of added compute capacity could translate, at current spot pricing and full utilization, into more than $50 billion in recurring annual revenue from a single quarter’s deployment.
If that pace were sustained through 2027, the AI compute operation alone could add more than $200 billion in annualized revenue over the year and potentially exit 2027 above $250 billion in annual revenue, according to the bullish scenario. For context, Tesla currently generates about $100 billion in annual revenue, making AI compute the key reason some investors see SpaceX as capable of outscaling even Tesla’s automotive and autonomy businesses.
Even if xAI and its Grok models underperform against rivals such as OpenAI or Anthropic, the compute-leasing thesis remains central. The view is that ownership of scarce AI infrastructure could be highly profitable regardless of which frontier model wins, because all advanced AI developers need large-scale compute for both training and inference.
Beyond compute, the merger thesis also leans on Starlink’s broadband growth, expected increases in bandwidth from Starship launches, and the prospect of orbital data infrastructure. Those businesses are seen as intermediate steps toward Musk’s longer-term goal of building the industrial and financial base required for a sustained Mars program.
Despite speculation that a proposal could arrive quickly, the expectation is that several additional quarters of execution may be needed before Tesla shareholders are ready. Stronger evidence from AI compute monetization, model adoption, and Starlink growth would likely be more important than any specific private-market valuation, because shareholders rather than the market would decide the outcome.
The push for overwhelming support is viewed as critical because a narrow loss could damage the idea for years. That creates an incentive to wait until operational performance at SpaceX is clear enough that the merger looks obviously accretive to a large majority of Tesla investors.
The merger case rests less on financial engineering than on whether SpaceX can demonstrate enough revenue and profit potential to win over Tesla shareholders. If AI compute and Starlink continue scaling rapidly, pressure for a combined Tesla-SpaceX structure is likely to grow.
Ask a question