
Tech • AI • Robotics • Game
Tesla is weighing a $10.1 billion Texas solar manufacturing complex that could anchor a vertically integrated U.S. energy business, even as it reportedly prepares to wind down the underperforming Cybertruck.
Tesla is considering a vast solar cell and panel factory in Fort Bend County, Texas, roughly 40 minutes from Houston. Project documents put the investment at $10.1 billion, including about $1.5 billion for land and property and $8.6 billion for machinery and equipment. The site would span roughly 3,000 acres and is projected to create 9,712 permanent full-time jobs plus about 1,147 peak construction jobs.
Construction is targeted for completion in 2028, with commercial production expected in the first quarter of 2029. The scale indicates a full industrial buildout rather than a pilot operation, positioning the plant as a major addition to domestic solar manufacturing capacity.
The proposed facility would go far beyond panel assembly, which still dominates much of U.S. solar manufacturing. Plans include equipment for silicon ingot production, wafer manufacturing, coatings, metallization, electrical contact printing, photovoltaic cell inspection, automated materials handling and clean rooms. That would allow Tesla to manage nearly every stage from raw silicon to finished solar modules.
A core objective is to lessen U.S. dependence on imported photovoltaic cells and components, especially from China. By localizing the supply chain in Texas, Tesla would be pursuing the same kind of vertical integration that has helped Chinese manufacturers dominate global solar production.
The strategic rationale extends beyond solar panels. Rapid growth in AI data centers, industrial electrification, electric vehicles and grid modernization is sharply increasing power demand. The bigger constraint on AI expansion may be electricity supply, not just semiconductor availability, creating an opening for companies that can generate, store and manage large amounts of power reliably.
Tesla appears to be positioning itself as an integrated energy provider rather than only an electric-vehicle maker. Combined with its battery factories and Megapack storage systems, large-scale solar manufacturing could let the company offer complete packages for utilities, businesses, households and power-hungry data centers: generation, storage and energy management in one system.
Elon Musk has previously cited a U.S. solar manufacturing target of about 100 gigawatts per year. If reached, that would place Tesla among the most influential players in the domestic solar market and could intensify pricing pressure on existing manufacturers while broadening access to lower-cost solar energy.
At the same time, Tesla is reportedly preparing to gradually end Cybertruck production at Gigafactory Texas around mid-2027. The production line would be repurposed for the Cybercab, the company’s planned autonomous robotaxi, reflecting a shift in capital and engineering resources toward self-driving transport.
The Cybertruck has fallen far short of early expectations. Initial targets called for roughly 250,000 annual sales, with a starting price of $39,900 and deliveries beginning in 2021. Deliveries instead started in 2023, pricing rose to roughly $75,000 or more, and sales in 2025 reportedly reached only about 8% of the original annual target. In the first nine months of 2026, U.S. sales were said to total around 11,000 to 12,000 units.
The vehicle has also been dogged by recalls, reports of loose body components, accelerator pedal defects, corrosion concerns and high repair complexity. Those issues, along with a limited repair network, have added to ownership costs and damped demand. The shift away from Cybertruck underscores a broader dilemma for Tesla: whether to keep supporting a niche, problematic vehicle or redirect scarce talent toward autonomous driving, a market with major promise but still significant technical and commercial uncertainty.
Project Crystal Sun would mark one of Tesla’s boldest attempts to control an entire industrial chain, from solar generation to stored electricity. Its success could reshape U.S. clean-energy manufacturing, while the pullback from Cybertruck shows the cost of concentrating resources on that future.
Ask a question